We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Ancient Rome and Cleopatra

essay
The whole doc is available only for registered users

A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

Order Now

Read the following passage carefully at least twice. What does it tell us about Plutarch’s view of the relationship between Antony and Cleopatra?

For Plutarch peoples actions, however trite, were great indications of a person’s moral character (Plutarch, 1914, p. 225). We can, therefore, assume that Plutarch would have placed great importance on the everyday activities of Cleopatra and Antony in reflecting the character of their relationship. Plutarch wrote 150 years after the events of Cleopatra and Antony and was therefore heavily influenced by Roman views of, not only, the couple themselves but also by Roman’s understanding and expectations of relationships, gender and race.

Plutarch highlights the inseparability of Cleopatra and Antony with his long list of the couple‚Äôs activities. To the modern reader, this behaviour would likely be understood as ‚Äúromantic love‚ÄĚ, the positive effect of two people having immense feelings for one another. Considering the Roman times in which Plutarch wrote, he would view these actions quite differently. The Roman moralising tradition of the time did not recognise love as a quality. In contrast, such an attachment as Cleopatra and Antony clearly had would be identified as a type of ‚Äúbewitchment‚ÄĚ.(Moohan, 2008, p. 10-11). Remembering this, we can decipher that the couple‚Äôs closeness would not be viewed by Plutarch as a positive aspect of their relationship, rather one that is fanatical.

Plutarch suggests a relationship that is controlled by Cleopatra. The use of the word ‚Äútutelage‚ÄĚ places authority with her and paints her like a prison warden constantly surveilling Antony (Plutarch, in AA100 Assignment Booklet, 2011, p.17). Antony is foolish and passive, whereas Cleopatra is composed and intelligent. He lacks astuteness as his illusional fishing trick is transparent to Cleopatra. In contrast, Cleopatra has great manipulative skills as shown when she cunningly turns the fishing trick around. This matriarchal relationship would be viewed by Plutarch as unnatural. In Roman society, a woman was viewed as the weaker sex that should be controlled by¬†man (Cavazzi, 2011). So in Plutarch‚Äôs eyes, Antony has failed to live up to his male role within the relationship.

Roman‚Äôs believed that ‚ÄúA man‚Äôs whole being is moulded by the habits of his daily life‚ÄĚ (Moohan, 2008. p. 27). To Plutarch, Antony‚Äôs activities such as fishing indicates Antony‚Äôs failure to live up to his honorable rank as a Roman general. He is clearly inferior to the man he once was when he hunted ‚Äúcities, realms, and continents‚ÄĚ (Plutarch, in AA100 Assignment Booklet, 2011, p.17).

At times, Plutarch shows more concern with Antony‚Äôs behaviour than Cleopatra‚Äôs. Antony‚Äôs actions are described as ‚Äúmad follies‚ÄĚ and, although Cleopatra participates, it is Antony‚Äôs actions that lack reason, not hers (Plutarch, in AA100 Assignment Booklet, 2011, p.17). Romans viewed Egyptian way of life as inferior and ‚Äúbarbaric‚ÄĚ compared to the civility of Roman culture as was reiterated by many Roman historians such as Cassius Dio (Moohan, 2008. p. 27). Therefore, Plutarch is more concerned with Antony‚Äôs actions as he expects more from a Roman man. As a woman and an Egyptian, Plutarch does not have such high expectations of Cleopatra hence why he is less focussed on her.

This passage underlines the relationship’s negative influence on Antony and highlights the power dynamics of the relationship. Cleopatra is in control and outwits Antony, whereas he is powerless and idiotic. Plutarch makes sense of Antony’s behaviour with a typical Roman view, he has been bewitched by Cleopatra and he is the victim because, being of a superior race and gender, he has more to lose than his female Egyptian partner.

Bibliography

Plutarch, Life of Antony, 29‚Äď30; reprinted in AA100 Assignment Booklet (October 2011), Milton Keynes, The Open University, p. 17

Moohan, E (2008) ‚ÄėPlutarch‚Äôs Antony: The Fallen Hero‚Äô, in Moohan, E. (ed.) Reputations (AA100 Book 1), Milton Keynes, The Open University, pp. 9-12.

Moohan, E (2008) ‚ÄėConstructing Cleopatra: ‚Äėspin‚Äô at Rome‚Äô, in Moohan, E.
(ed.) Reputations (AA100 Book 1), Milton Keynes, The Open University, pp. 6-9.

Moohan, E (2008) ‚ÄėAugustus on Cleopatra‚Äô, in Moohan, E. (ed.) Reputations (AA100 Book 1), Milton Keynes, The Open University, pp. 27.

Plutarch, Goodwin, W. (1874) Plutarch’s Morals, Volume 5, Little, Brown and Company, Harvard University

‚ÄúTranslators Introduction‚ÄĚ in Plutarch (1914) The Parallel Lives published in Vol. VII of the Loeb Classical Library edition, available from http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Introduction*.html (Accessed 25 October 2011)

Cavazzi, F. Roman Society, Roman Life, available from http://www.roman-empire.net/society/society.html (Accessed 1 December 2011)

Related Topics

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay
icon
300+
Materials Daily
icon
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
icon
Free Plagiarism
Checker
icon
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access
immediately?

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!

logo

Emma Taylor

online

Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Can't find What you were Looking for?

Get access to our huge, continuously updated knowledge base

The next update will be in:
14 : 59 : 59