A Civil Action Movie Notes
- Pages: 2
- Word count: 415
- Category: College Example
A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteedOrder Now
Had no evidence no real investigation no research RULE 11 is a nonsense because it’s so old Team of geologist and engineers are needed to show if the wells are actually contaminated 6 barrels were found in the back, in a pit Solvent… In barrels They get dumped out back, in the ground (witness) Immune system of kids: tore down to nothing He was doing well, and he looked fine… T was abrupt Facer: ‘these people can never testify’ Silicon and ETC are used to waterproof leather Silicon is poured on… O some of the spill will fall off of the ground 50 more barrels that city inspector didn’t find “dump it out there in the gulled” Or dump it in a ditch Pour it into a pit Dump it into the swimming pool Lawsuit: compel the others to settle Schuman wants 25 mil cash… And another 25 mil to establish a research foundation to establish link between chemicals and illness… 1. 5 mil annually for families for 30 years Facer claims that Schuman wants money
Geological evidence has to come first; there needs to be proof that the chemicals reach the wells first before the parents of victims can testify The questions were confusing Facer offer a 20 mil settlement for Beatrice WAR Grace: Yes on IQ Beatrice: No on all questions >> case has ended for them Grace offer 8 million Schuman said that he owed the families more than that 375 K per family The companies aren’t going to clean up the place Anne was not interested in money >> she still wanted the apology >> she said that he said that they apologized with their checkbooks >> Schuman said sorry, UT Anne said it was not meaningful The families even lost more that the lawyers Dump trucks full of scraps kids playing with fire… The water went up in flames Riley told the worker to keep his mouth shut with Celtic tickets APPEAL Judge Skinner found that John Riley deliberately concealed evidence at the trial. His tanner was torn down in 1990. WAR Grace was indicted by the Grand Jury for making false statements to the EPA regarding its use of ETC, acetone, and toluene.