Psychological Treatment of Gilbert Study of His Self Assessment
- Pages: 5
- Word count: 1237
- Category: Psychological Disorders Self Assessment
A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed
Order NowThere is no prior treatment or services reported with this being Gilbertâs first initial visit. Gilbert is not currently receiving any medical or mental health treatment or services. He reports that he only went to the doctor to get his shots when he was younger. He denies any changes in his sleep pattern. He also, denies any appetite changes, but reporting that he eats a lot of unhealthy foods. No recent or prior hospitalizations within the past year. Gilbert reports that the last time he was in the hospital was when he was born. There is no reported history of or presence of suicidal ideations or homicidal ideations.
Recommended Treatment Goals/Strategies
Human problems in respect to multidimensionality, is âa consequence of the fact that human beings are social creatures who depend both on other human beings and complex social institutions to meet their needsâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 186). It is also, an individualâs emotions that âare complex experiences, expressing reactions to past, present, and future eventsâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 483). Both statements are reflective of Gilbert.
With this said, Gilbertâs problems, are a result of reciprocal interaction that has occurred between him and the world around him. To develop individualized treatment goals for Gilbert, while demonstrating âsensitivity to the multiple system influencesâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 485) and clarifying his relationships, it is important to focus on Gilbert and his environment. This is done using the ecosystems perspective, which allows the ability âto address the psychosocial matrix of which individuals, families, groups, and communities are constituentsâ (Mattaini & Meyer, n/d., p. 1).
This can be illustrated, as an ecomap, which is âa graphic device for viewing the relevant, connected case elements together, within the boundary that clarifies for the practitioner the case system as the focus of workâ (Mattaini & Meyer, n/d., p. 2). Refer to diagram 1, which is an ecomap of Gilbert and his environment, which is a âclose conceptual fit with the âperson-in-environmentââ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 16).
It is the niche concept of the ecological systems theory, which âis central to ecologyâ with all aspects of the nicheâs considered, âas the âenvironmentââ (Holt, 2009). This is reflective of Gilbert (niche) and the ecomap of his environment. It is according to Gottfredson, the ecological niches and niche seeking are concepts âderived from developmental psychology to explain how individuals find their place in the world. As social beings, we strive to find our place in society, and vocational choice is one way to announce our placeâ (Swanson & Fouad, 2015, p. 160).
Gilbert appears to have a niche of human dignity and displaying kindness and concern for other people, which can be influential attributes (niches) for his future. In applying niche seeking to Gilbert, it could be utilized, as a goal to assist with finding his niche âin society, which is essential to achieving self-respect and a stable sense of identityâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 16).
Gottfredson explains that an individualâs vocational âpreferences are so tightly linked with self-concept because individuals are very concerned about their place in social lifeâ (Brown, 2002, p. 94). Gottfredson also, explains that it is the cognitive developmental growth of children, which allows for their individualized self-concept thus, allowing them to find purpose and meaning in their career choices (Swanson & Fouad, 2015, p. 160). Even though Gilbert is in adulthood, he is still conflicted with his identity and role confusion of adolescence development.
It is the adolescence stage when adolescents begin â[o]rienting to more internally defined goals and internally based concepts of selfâ and âthey being to forge a more personal sense of selfâ (Brown, 2002, p. 99). It is Gilbert who is cognitively oriented x3 but lacks free time to himself due to his family obligations. Time that would allow Gilbert to personally define his self-concept. It is applying self-concept with Gilbert, such as involving career identity thus, separating his dependence from his family and allowing him to concentrate on himself.
Two individualized treatment goals for Gilbert are: 1) Within 6 months, Gilbert will use niche seeking to identify his own niches and allow for personal interest identification, and 2) within 6 months, Gilbert will discover himself/his own identity with the ability to distinguish himself, as one self-individual from the family.
Conclusion
Clients seek professional services to help them with their problems and as a result, it is the assessment process that âfocuses on developing a pictureâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 192) of the individual clientâs life and their problem(s). It is a multidimensional assessment that âmake[s] use of concepts drawn from the fields of ego psychologyâ and âconcepts prominent in object relations theory, such as attachment and interpersonal relationship patternsâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 194).
When completing an assessment, it requires substantial knowledge and understanding about the individual, as well as various systems, such as: âeconomic, legal education, medical, religious, social, [and] interpersonal [,]â (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 186) which affects or has an impact on the client system. Also, there is a need to assess the individualâs functioning, such as: âdynamic interactions among the individualâs biophysical, cognitive, emotional, cultural, behavioral, and motivational subsystems [,] and the relationships of those interactions to the clientâs problemsâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 186). Therefore, it is the needs of the client and the servicing âagencyâs purpose and resources,â (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 186) which will most definitely influence the âchoices and prioritiesâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 186) of the professional social worker when completing a multidimensional assessment.
A social workerâs way âof thinking and perceiving clients [is] culturally conditioned and culturally basedâ (Stampley & Slaght, 2004, p. 345) and it is their actions, which are referred to as countertransference. It is this âcultural biases and/or insensitivity to cultural differencesâ (Stampley & Slaght, 2004, p. 333) that could result in the social worker lacking empathy while distorting an understanding of the client. Also, it can create âa clinical obstacle that interferes with the therapeutic [clinician and client] relationshipâ (Stampley & Slaght, 2004, p. 333) and even âimpact their clinical practiceâ (Stampley & Slaght, 2004, p. 334).
It important to remember that there is a significant âinfluence of culture on development,â which has been recognized by Ericksonâs Theory of Psychosocial Development along with further emphasis, that âthe social world exists within the psychological makeup of each individualâ (Sokol, 2009, p. 140). As a professional social worker, itâs important to be aware of oneâs own âhistory, [beliefs], values, biases[,] and behaviorsâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 186) while practicing ethically and with professionalism, so that any differences do not interject negatively during client interaction(s), as well as during the assessment process. Also, when engaging diversity and cultural differences, it is important to adhere to the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics (NASW) specifically, ethical standard 1, Social Workersâ Ethical Responsibilities to Clients, (1.05) Cultural Competence and Social Diversity (NASW) (Workers, 2008).
It is during the assessment process, which it is important for the social worker âto consider the degree to which the client experiences a goodness of fit with the culture in which he or she is situatedâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 191). It is â[t]his âgoodness-of-fitâ [that] is a consideration when examining any person in the context of his or her environmentâ (Hepworth et al., 2013, p. 191). Thus, by exhibiting âcultural awareness, communication, and understanding,â (Renzaho et al., 2012 p.265) allows for the facilitation of effectively engaging with diverse clients/families.