Evaluating a Wesite
A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteedOrder Now
In this paper, I have chosen a health-related website and evaluated its credibility. The search engine used to locate the domain, mayoclinic.org, was Google. The specific web address is http://mayoclinic.org. Mayo Clinic is a healthcare organization centered on patient care. It offers locations in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Mayoclinic.org is a website based from the organization, Mayo Clinic, which offers a wealth of health-related information on medicine, occupational health, health promotion, and disease management. The purpose of mayoclinic.org is to educate and provide medical resources to the general public over the age of eighteen years old and medical professionals through different types of literature and retail avenues. It also offers convenient services to patients and potential patients of Mayo Clinic, such as scheduling appointments and contact information for various departments within the organization (Mayo Clinic, 2014). As a nurse, I am always looking for reliable websites that I can send my patients to collect health information. The Mayo Clinic is very popular in the healthcare world. Therefore, the credibility of mayoclinic.org was evaluated using the criteria: authority, information, objectivity, ease of navigation, and privacy and security policies (Chamberlain College of Nursing [CCN], 2014). Evaluation Criteria
The authority of a website refers to the qualifications of the author or authors of the site (CCN, 2014). The credentials of the author(s) and/or editor(s) should be examined (Orlowski, Oermann, & Shaw-Kokot, 2013). On the site, mayoclinic.org, the information that is placed on the website pages come from a plethora of medical editors. The editing staff consists of: a medical director, senior medical editors, a founding medical editor, and specialty medical editors. These editors work on the web content daily to ensure the content is clear, relevant, and accurate. Each editor’s name has a link attached to it so visitors can learn more about them professionally (Mayo Clinic, 2014). It is important that the credentials of each editor are represented (Orlowski et al., 2013). Information
The information on a website should be accurate, up-to-date, and appropriate for its designated audience (CCN, 2014). Information that is current on a website can be exhibited by recent research or information referenced, working links, and/or a recent update notated on the site (Roberts, 2010). As stated previously, content goes through M.D. credentialed editors on mayoclinic.org. Other content on the website, such as drug information and publications, are current and are provided through Micromedex and PubMed. The content presented on mayoclinic.org is appropriate for its intended audience of eighteen and over. The health content on mayoclinic.org requires a high school reading level or higher (Mayo Clinic, 2014). Objectivity
Criteria evaluated in objectivity includes if material presented on a website is biased or not. Ways to evaluate bias is to look a site’s sponsorships and/or advertisements (CCN, 2014). Mayoclinic.org accepts sponsorships and advertising based on strict guidelines. The site proclaims all advertisement and sponsors must comply with Mayo Clinic’s mission and value statement. A clear separation between advertisements and editorial material is represented. Sponsorships and advertisements are clearly labeled and identified on mayoclinic.org (Mayo Clinic, 2014). The advertisements and sponsorships do not seem to affect the information presented on the website. Health-related literature is presented factually and unbiased. Ease of Navigation
The construction of a website is also a distinguishing factor of credibility (CCN, 2014). The web page must be organized; pages load quickly, font available in different sizes and languages, and a site search engine to help find things easier on a site are all important factors (Roberts, 2010). Mayoclinic.org loads fairly quickly, different languages are available on some pages on the site, and a site search engine is also available. The site does not offer a font size change or specify computer requirements for optimal website viewing (Mayo Clinic, 2014). Privacy and Security
This has sparked the development of many health-centered websites. Unfortunately, not all websites that offer this information present accurate information (Orlowski, et al., 2013). As a nurse, it is imperative that the correct evaluation methods are utilized to help educate patients on the accuracy of such websites (Roberts, 2010). In turn, patients can apply these methods when searching on the internet independently. Nurses can utilize credible health-related websites to stay current on certain information. Referring your patients to credible websites can enhance or offer an alternative to patient education. Lastly, credible websites may offer empowerment to your patients. Patients seem to feel more assertive about their healthcare situation when they use credible websites to access health-related information (Anderson & Klemm, 2008).
Anderson, A., & Klemm, P. (2008). The Internet: Friend or foe when providing patient education? Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 12(1), pp. 55–63. doi:10.1188/08.CJON.55-63 Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2014). NR500 Foundational Concepts and Applications: Week 2 lesson. [Lecture notes]. St. Louis, MO: online publication. Mayo Clinic (2014). Retrieved from http://mayoclinic.org on July, 14, 15, 16, 2014. Orlowski, J. L., Oermann, M. H., & Shaw-Kokot, J. (2013). Evaluation of heart failure websites for patient education. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 35(3), pp. 240-246. doi:10.1097/TME.0b013e318296469b Roberts, L. (2010). Health information and the internet: The 5 Cs website evaluation tool. British Journal of Nursing, 19(5), pp. 322-325.