‘How accurate is the film GANDHI in accounting Mahatma
- Pages: 2
- Word count: 420
- Category: Accounting College Example Mahatma
A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed
Order NowIt moves across five decades of time, all fitted into three hours of film. Attenuator’s only shows the responders the most important things before quickly shuffling to another scene. Throughout the whole movie, all the characters speak in English. It is true that Gandhi did speak this language when he lived in South Africa; and few of the Congressmen (particularly Zinnia) felt at home with the English language; but the Mahatma switched to talking in Hindi (the common language of Indians at the time) to identify himself with the peasants.
It seems that Mohammad Gandhi held popularity right through his whole life, UT this is not true. GANDHI presents the hero of the movie as a superhuman; but not everyone in India was with him. His popularity was at an all time low, especially after he failed to convince the Round Table conference in London that Indian was ready for independence. It is likely that the march against the salt company ever happened; or if it did it was not as spectacular as shown in the film. The two notorious fasts undertaken in the movie by Gandhi brought results immediately.
Within days, Gandhi got what he asked for. Attenuator’s even made Gandhi look like a martyr; putting his own life in danger in an attempt to stop violence. In reality however, Gandhi went through many more fasts (notably while in prison) and probably ended them before bringing total peace to save his own life. GANDHI does not fully outline the Gandhi theory (reaching the truth). The only Gandhi theories presented in the movie are the principles on how to overthrow the English government in India (non-violent non-cooperation).
Gandhi, in the movie, shouts out, “Oh God! When he is shot by Goods. In reality, he shouted out “Ram,” the name of an Indian God. Attenuator’s made Kinsley cry out “God” because he wanted Gandhi to seem open to all religions. Excepting these few minor (if it can be called this) errors, Attenuator’s has made sure his film is historically accurate as well as entertaining. He spent many years just preparing to shoot the video and spent much time researching Indian’s modern history. It is futile to even try to find major mistakes in Authenticator’s masterpiece GANDHI.