We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Courtroom work group Argumentative

The whole doc is available only for registered users
  • Pages: 2
  • Word count: 298
  • Category: Work

A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

Order Now

The courtroom workgroup is a mechanism for prosecution discretion. A prosecuting attorney has power on various matters including those relating to choosing whether or not to bring criminal charges, deciding the nature of charges, plea bargaining and sentence recommendation. This discretion of the prosecuting attorney is called prosecutorial discretion. The court room work group consists of ten members. The Judge, Bailiff, court reporter, witness, defendant, prosecutor, defense counsel, clerk of the court, jury, spectators and the press. There aren’t many ways that the courtroom work group can interact, the main three ways are these; Three interaction techniques that are frequently utilized are unilateral decisions, adversarial proceedings, and negotiations.

The prosecutor’s role is to protect the rights of the public. The prosecutor represents the entire community, attempting to ensure their safety from the wrongful actions of criminals. “Prosecutors usually determine whether to file a case based on whether they think they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offense” (Cota, A. 2012) . “Prosecutors have limited resources so that they cannot possibly pursue every single case they are presented.

Although I am not privy to their decision making process, I imagine they select cases based on their strength and merit, and the potential benefit for the public” (Mashal, R. 2012). If the criteria for taking a case were less stringent then cases would not be put forth based on evidence. This would make the prosecutor’s job more intense because they would have to prove a case without any evidence. The jurors would be going off assumptions and not proof. A lot of cases will be thrown out because of insufficient evidence and a lot of guilty people could walk free or vice versa innocent people could be wrongfully accused.


Related Topics

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay
Materials Daily
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
Free Plagiarism
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Can't find What you were Looking for?

Get access to our huge, continuously updated knowledge base

The next update will be in:
14 : 59 : 59