John Deere & Company Worldwide Logistics
- Pages: 2
- Word count: 465
- Category: Contract
A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteedOrder Now
John Deere & Company Worldwide Logistics has Kevin MacAuley as a summer intern. He has been assigned to evaluate the outsourcing arrangements, identify opportunities, and make recommendations. He is given three different approaches to be taken into consideration; insourcing all logistics services, insourcing selected services, or continue to outsource. John Deere uses FedEx Logistics as a third-party provider. There are eleven different units, and each unit has its own service agreement.
If John Deere decides to take the insourcing all logistics services approach, they must consider the trade-offs that come along. They have not been insourcing, so all of these considerations are new to the picture. The biggest advantage of insourcing is standardization within the entire organization. This reduces cost, as well as increases visibility and communication. Ultimately, they could save money by solely insourcing. However, insourcing takes away from the primary business focus because if you’re doing everything in-house; you’re not focusing on your core competency and that in turn takes away from the overall business aspect. This all leads to a low-cost factor, and higher cost for investing.
Outsourcing is the current situation John Deere is in. By outsourcing with FedEx, they are spreading their risk, and able to focus on their core competency. Outsourcing improves the business focus and offers a vast array of resources that may not be available internally. The disadvantages of outsourcing are mainly focused on a loss of control because you are now partnering with another entity. This leads to hidden cost, a threat of security, as well as quality problems.
The last option is to use what we have named a “mixed strategy.” This would be a hybrid of outsourcing and insourcing. This promotes strategic partnerships and can lead to an improvement in flexibly. Using both, you can still focus on your core competency because you’re still outsourcing your weak points, and scope creep is ultimately eliminated. However the process can become more complicated when both strategies are being used. Lastly, there can be issues of trust and communications considering you’re
changing the relationship.
Our recommendation is to use the “mixed strategy.” We believe that this is the best strategy because it provides an efficient and effective solution. Using this strategy gives John Deere more of a competitive advantage and enables them to focus on their strengths by insourcing, and opportunities by outsourcing what could not be done internally. We recommend that more effective communication and reconstruction of contracts and operations would lead to more visibility. What we mean by this is basically making one clear contract for all, instead of eleven poorly defined contracts. We also recommend collaboration and consolidation. If each location worked together and consolidated their shipments then that would ultimately cut cost and provide a more efficient service.