We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Angry men movie to book analyisis.

The whole doc is available only for registered users

A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

Order Now

The action in this play is that of a tense and tight because of the seriousness of the case at hand. Sidney Lumens uses the tense environment in the play to make the movie seem as realistic as possible. The tension also plagues the members of the jury. The jury comes from many different life styles. The wealthier of the jurors degrade and put down the neighborhood from which a few jurors lived in which causes the tension to only rise. These scenes of conflict raise the intensity of the movie and grab the viewer? Attention, and while the audience is pulled in the many little important details are reviled. Sidney Lumens adds more scenes in his portrayal. The bathroom scene, one of the added scenes, is where two jurors discuss the verdict away from the loud conference room, where much of the commotion is going on. William Friedman uses a little different odd of action; he tones those scenes down a little, but makes them more frequent as an attempt to keep viewers attention longer.

The action scenes are what create the tense atmosphere where the debates begin and where they end. The variation of camera angles and of quality angles provides the viewers with something more to devote their attention to. Sidney Lumens uses this technique generously throughout the movies because it enhances the effect of what characters are saying. When a camera zooms in on an actor? S face to draw attention away for the other actors and to focus on the speaker you can? T help, but be pulled into what his words are saying.

William Friedman uses this technique but he allows another actor in the camera view that agrees with the speaker, making the speakers words have more meaning. Both directors use this technique to force major ideas and points that he wants to make clear. This effect irately enhances the overall story because the audience will know the facts and will be able to follow the story. Lightning is also a very important feature in films because make a viewer look to a certain point on the screen when brighter light is put on a particular spot.

Both directors bring attention to speakers and to set moods and tones for the film by using this odd. In the corners of the rooms there is shadows and it is very dark because the director does not want the attention of the viewer to be looking at the room so much as the actors and the themes. The lighting is also focused on important objects in the room such as the knife and the diagram so the viewer is allowed to get a clear look at the evidence that is being shown. This also allows the audience to keep up with the story and not lose attention.

Lighting is a key feature in movies and both directors use it to their advantage, to keep the story going and to draw attention to important people and objects. The age of the films plays an important feature in how the different meanings of the play relate with the viewer. In William Friedman? S movie he uses many different people to narrate the story in which many people can understand. A he uses three black in his films one is an activist, one is an older man, and the third is a middle-aged man who lived in the slums.

Not just other actors are constantly picking on but these men, but also by each other, which is kind of ironic. The activist is very racist, contrary to what you would think he would be, against the people who lived in the slums, the other juror who lived in the slums is very angry about how he is being treated and that he is not being a different race but that of his own. The older movie by Sidney Lumens has the same argument but t is between two white men but it is less prominent because the whites in the movie are supposed to be more argumentative and more racial than that of a minority race.

The time span between these two movies is just about thirty years and between those thirty years a lot has happened, this show the way the world is changing and how our society is changing with it. During each film the same message can be seen in each both directors make the film there own by their choice in the cast and the way each character is portrayed. These movies are each strong in their own sense and keep true to the original play.

Related Topics

We can write a custom essay

According to Your Specific Requirements

Order an essay
Materials Daily
100,000+ Subjects
2000+ Topics
Free Plagiarism
All Materials
are Cataloged Well

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email.

By clicking "SEND", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Sorry, but only registered users have full access

How about getting this access

Your Answer Is Very Helpful For Us
Thank You A Lot!


Emma Taylor


Hi there!
Would you like to get such a paper?
How about getting a customized one?

Can't find What you were Looking for?

Get access to our huge, continuously updated knowledge base

The next update will be in:
14 : 59 : 59