The Negative Impact of Companies on Water Pollution

When company focus their own interest to make profit and ignore its bad impact on environmental issue, the political framework will address this problem, and change them into an enactment or law. Business irresponsibility could prompt new standards or guidelines. Then, the company need to respond to the regulation to make a change, it will make the business loss competitive advantages. These new guidelines and laws could limit the executives in deciding. For example, government set a clean water act, if your business creates water pollution, you could get the lawsuit. The company may be charged and need to take corrective action immediately, therefore negatively affected company performance. To maximize profit, company need to expect the government’s impact on promoting dynamic through the adoption of execution gauges.

Frederick (1960) characterizes social responsibility as a business managing the activity of a monetary framework that satisfies the desires for general society and upgrades the total associations social-economic welfare. When company take social responsibility by making business without harm environment, it will be keeping organisation profit in the long run (Dahlsrud, 2007). It is long haul investment resolution that brings to win-win plans (Burke & Logsdon, 1996). The intention of company as social function is consistent with company’s long-term economic interests, which is sustainability. Company sustainability indicate how business reach to enhanced ethical gauges, just as the balance in economic and environmental to meet the stakeholder’s expectation. Wilson (2003) claimed that company sustainability as profit maximization framework.

Next, consumers concern with green production as the public awareness for the natural are increasing (Shetzer et. al, 1991). Therefore, consumer will not support the product which is not concern for environment. In the Cone Communications/Ebiquity Global study identify that 91% of worldwide shoppers anticipate that organizations should work mindfully to address natural issues. The company will get external pressure from public opinion.

Besides, it will affect employee morale. When the company just focus on itself to maximize the profit however it affects the natural, employee will feel that they are support the company to hurt the natural environment. It will cause employee loss of the favourable job attitudes and productivity.When company focus their own interest to make profit and ignore its bad impact on environmental issue, the political framework will address this problem, and change them into an enactment or law. Business irresponsibility could prompt new standards or guidelines. Then, the company need to respond to the regulation to make a change, it will make the business loss competitive advantages. These new guidelines and laws could limit the executives in deciding. For example, government set a clean water act, if your business creates water pollution, you could get the lawsuit. The company may be charged and need to take corrective action immediately, therefore negatively affected company performance. To maximize profit, company need to expect the government’s impact on promoting dynamic through the adoption of execution gauges.

Frederick (1960) characterizes social responsibility as a business managing the activity of a monetary framework that satisfies the desires for general society and upgrades the total associations social-economic welfare. When company take social responsibility by making business without harm environment, it will be keeping organisation profit in the long run (Dahlsrud, 2007). It is long haul investment resolution that brings to win-win plans (Burke & Logsdon, 1996). The intention of company as social function is consistent with company’s long-term economic interests, which is sustainability. Company sustainability indicate how business reach to enhanced ethical gauges, just as the balance in economic and environmental to meet the stakeholder’s expectation. Wilson (2003) claimed that company sustainability as profit maximization framework.

Next, consumers concern with green production as the public awareness for the natural are increasing (Shetzer et. al, 1991). Therefore, consumer will not support the product which is not concern for environment. In the Cone Communications/Ebiquity Global study identify that 91% of worldwide shoppers anticipate that organizations should work mindfully to address natural issues. The company will get external pressure from public opinion.

Besides, it will affect employee morale. When the company just focus on itself to maximize the profit however it affects the natural, employee will feel that they are support the company to hurt the natural environment. It will cause employee loss of the favourable job attitudes and productivity.When company focus their own interest to make profit and ignore its bad impact on environmental issue, the political framework will address this problem, and change them into an enactment or law. Business irresponsibility could prompt new standards or guidelines. Then, the company need to respond to the regulation to make a change, it will make the business loss competitive advantages. These new guidelines and laws could limit the executives in deciding. For example, government set a clean water act, if your business creates water pollution, you could get the lawsuit. The company may be charged and need to take corrective action immediately, therefore negatively affected company performance. To maximize profit, company need to expect the government’s impact on promoting dynamic through the adoption of execution gauges.

Frederick (1960) characterizes social responsibility as a business managing the activity of a monetary framework that satisfies the desires for general society and upgrades the total associations social-economic welfare. When company take social responsibility by making business without harm environment, it will be keeping organisation profit in the long run (Dahlsrud, 2007). It is long haul investment resolution that brings to win-win plans (Burke & Logsdon, 1996). The intention of company as social function is consistent with company’s long-term economic interests, which is sustainability. Company sustainability indicate how business reach to enhanced ethical gauges, just as the balance in economic and environmental to meet the stakeholder’s expectation. Wilson (2003) claimed that company sustainability as profit maximization framework.

Next, consumers concern with green production as the public awareness for the natural are increasing (Shetzer et. al, 1991). Therefore, consumer will not support the product which is not concern for environment. In the Cone Communications/Ebiquity Global study identify that 91% of worldwide shoppers anticipate that organizations should work mindfully to address natural issues. The company will get external pressure from public opinion.

Besides, it will affect employee morale. When the company just focus on itself to maximize the profit however it affects the natural, employee will feel that they are support the company to hurt the natural environment. It will cause employee loss of the favourable job attitudes and productivity.When company focus their own interest to make profit and ignore its bad impact on environmental issue, the political framework will address this problem, and change them into an enactment or law. Business irresponsibility could prompt new standards or guidelines. Then, the company need to respond to the regulation to make a change, it will make the business loss competitive advantages. These new guidelines and laws could limit the executives in deciding. For example, government set a clean water act, if your business creates water pollution, you could get the lawsuit. The company may be charged and need to take corrective action immediately, therefore negatively affected company performance. To maximize profit, company need to expect the government’s impact on promoting dynamic through the adoption of execution gauges.

Frederick (1960) characterizes social responsibility as a business managing the activity of a monetary framework that satisfies the desires for general society and upgrades the total associations social-economic welfare. When company take social responsibility by making business without harm environment, it will be keeping organisation profit in the long run (Dahlsrud, 2007). It is long haul investment resolution that brings to win-win plans (Burke & Logsdon, 1996). The intention of company as social function is consistent with company’s long-term economic interests, which is sustainability. Company sustainability indicate how business reach to enhanced ethical gauges, just as the balance in economic and environmental to meet the stakeholder’s expectation. Wilson (2003) claimed that company sustainability as profit maximization framework.

Next, consumers concern with green production as the public awareness for the natural are increasing (Shetzer et. al, 1991). Therefore, consumer will not support the product which is not concern for environment. In the Cone Communications/Ebiquity Global study identify that 91% of worldwide shoppers anticipate that organizations should work mindfully to address natural issues. The company will get external pressure from public opinion.

Besides, it will affect employee morale. When the company just focus on itself to maximize the profit however it affects the natural, employee will feel that they are support the company to hurt the natural environment. It will cause employee loss of the favourable job attitudes and productivity.